• Login
    View Item 
    •   UNTHSC Scholar
    • Research Appreciation Day
    • 2019
    • Abstracts
    • Pharmaceutical Sciences
    • View Item
    •   UNTHSC Scholar
    • Research Appreciation Day
    • 2019
    • Abstracts
    • Pharmaceutical Sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Genetic Influences on Opioid Use in Low Back Pain: OPRM1 rs1799971

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2019-03-05
    Author
    Romanowski, Benjamin
    Phillips, Nicole PhD, MS
    Licciardone, John DO, MS, MBA, FACPM
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Purpose: The OPRM1 rs1799971 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) has been studied for its influence on drug abuse and opioid use. Opioids have a questionable long-term risk-benefit profile in chronic low back pain, and a genetic predisposition to taking higher doses could place a patient at higher risk of complications related to opioid use. Studies have demonstrated higher dosages of self-administered opioids in an acute post-surgical setting in subjects with the rs1799971 AG polymorphism. We hypothesize that subjects with the rs1799971 AG polymorphism will use higher doses of opioids than subjects with other rs1799971 polymorphisms in the setting of chronic low back pain. Methods: This study was conducted using data from the PRECISION Pain Research Registry at UNTHSC. A saliva sample from each subject was obtained to determine genotypes, including the OPRM1 rs1799971 SNP. Additionally, numerical ratings of low back pain intensity and opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were measured. The MMEs were computed in accord with CDC guidelines, which further indicate that opioid doses greater than 50 MMEs per day double the risk of opioid complications as compared with doses under 20 MMEs per day. We analyzed pain intensity, daily MMEs, and the proportion of subjects taking doses in excess of 50 MMEs per day based on allele status at SNP rs1799971. Results: Of 351 subjects with subacute or chronic low back pain, 279 were AA and 72 were AG. There was no significant difference in MMEs between rs1799971 AA subjects (x̅=5.90, SD=17.03) and AG subjects (x̅=9.53, SD=22.85). AG subjects had statistically significant lower pain intensity (x̅=5.2777 SD=1.74) compared to AA subjects (x̅=5.985, SD=1.9489 Mann-Whitney U=7897.5 p=0.005). rs1799971 AG subjects were more likely to be taking opioid doses greater than 50 MMEs per day than AA subjects (OR=3.40 95% CI:1.01-11.46 p=0.04). Five and 6 subjects with AG and AA, respectively, were taking doses greater than 50 MMEs per day (OR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.01-11.46; Fishers exact p=0.11) Conclusion: There was no significant difference in mean MMEs among rs1799971 AG and AA subjects. However, AG subjects were marginally more likely than AA subjects to be taking doses greater than 50 MMEs per day. This SNP could potentially place rs1799971 AG patients at higher risk of complications relating to higher opioid doses, indicating a less favorable risk-benefit profile for long-term opioid therapy.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12503/27421
    Collections
    • Pharmaceutical Sciences

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UNTHSC ScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV