Integrative Physiology
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12503/32551
Browse
Browsing Integrative Physiology by Author "Bhuiyan, Nasrul"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item The Effect of 0.1 Hz Blood Flow Oscillations on Microvascular Blood Flow Responses Following Severe Ischemia(2024-03-21) Davis, K. Austin; Bhuiyan, Nasrul; McIntyre, Benjamin; Rickards, CarolineBackground: We have shown that inducing 10 second (0.1 Hz) oscillations in arterial pressure and blood flow protects against reductions in tissue oxygenation during ischemia, independent of changes in macrovascular blood flow. However, it is unknown whether 0.1 Hz hemodynamic oscillations impacts microvascular function and vasodilatory capacity following severe ischemia. To examine this question, we assessed the reactive hyperemic response following a prolonged peripheral limb ischemia protocol with and without induced 0.1 Hz hemodynamic oscillations. Hypothesis: 0.1 Hz oscillations in blood pressure and blood flow will increase microvascular blood flow, assessed via reactive hyperemia following a 10-min period of ischemia. Methods: Thirteen healthy human participants (6M, 7F; 27.3 ± 4.2 y) completed two experimental protocols separated by ≥48 h. In both conditions, ischemia of the forearm was induced with a pneumatic cuff on the upper arm to decrease brachial artery blood velocity by ~70-80% from baseline. In the oscillation condition (OSC), 0.1 Hz oscillations in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and brachial artery blood flow were induced by inflating and deflating bilateral thigh cuffs every 5-s (10-s cycles; 0.1 Hz) throughout the forearm ischemia period. In the control condition (CON), the thigh cuffs were in place, but were inactive throughout the forearm ischemia period. Beat to beat arterial pressure was measured via finger photo plethysmography, and brachial artery diameter and blood velocity were measured via duplex Doppler ultrasound during baseline, ischemia, and the reperfusion period. The maximum mean brachial artery blood velocity, and 3-min area under the curve (AUC) of mean brachial artery blood velocity were used to determine the reactive hyperemia response. Results: The magnitude of forearm ischemia, indexed by the reduction in brachial artery conductance, was matched between conditions (CON: -74.8 ± 10.4% vs. OSC: -75.6 ± 6.7%, p=0.39). Reactive hyperemia was not different between conditions as indexed by maximum mean brachial artery blood velocity (CON: 36.4 ± 12.4 cm/s vs. OSC: 39.3 ± 11.2 cm/s, p=0.53) or 3-min brachial artery blood velocity AUC (CON: 1495 ± 744 (cm/s)2 vs. OSC: 1596 ± 804 (cm/s)2, p=0.74). Conclusion: Inducing 0.1 Hz hemodynamic oscillations during severe ischemia does not affect microvascular function, indexed by reactive hyperemia following release of the ischemic stimulus. A more direct measure of microvascular blood flow is needed to examine whether 0.1 Hz hemodynamic oscillations improves microvascular perfusion during ischemia.Item Evaluating the Role of Arterial Stiffness on Amplitude of Cerebral Blood Flow Oscillations(2024-03-21) Lal, Kevin; Davis, Austin; Anderson, Garen; Bhuiyan, Nasrul; Rickards, CarolineBackground: Changing the pattern of cerebral blood flow by forcing oscillations in arterial pressure and blood flow at 0.1 Hz (10-second cycle) can limit reductions in cerebral tissue oxygenation during a condition of reduced cerebral perfusion. This method of inducing 0.1 Hz hemodynamic oscillations is called Pulsatile Perfusion Therapy (PPT). Sympathetic activation can increase the amplitude of 0.1 Hz hemodynamic oscillations, and acutely increase arterial stiffness. The impact of increasing carotid arterial stiffness on the magnitude of 0.1 Hz cerebral blood flow oscillations has not been examined. We hypothesize that the with application of 0.1 Hz PPT during a condition of cerebral hypoperfusion, 1) the subsequent increase in sympathetic activity will acutely increase carotid arterial stiffness, and; 2) greater carotid artery stiffness will result in a higher amplitude of oscillations in cerebral blood flow. Methods: 10 healthy participants (8 males, 2 females) were exposed to 10-min of oscillatory lower body negative pressure (OLBNP) at 0.1 Hz, which induced both a state of cerebral hypoperfusion, and 0.1 Hz hemodynamic oscillations. Middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv), internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter, and beat-to-beat arterial pressure were measured. ICA stiffness was determined using the beta-stiffness index, incorporating ICA diameter and arterial pressure measurements. The amplitude of 0.1 Hz MCAv oscillations was assessed via fast Fourier transformation. Results: While OLBNP increased MCAv 0.1 Hz oscillations (36.1 ± 24.2 cm/s2 vs. 812.4 ± 668.0 cm/s2; P=0.01), ICA beta stiffness was not different between the baseline and OLBNP conditions (12.3 ± 4.9 au vs. 13.2 ± 5.7 au; P=0.56). There was no relationship between ICA stiffness and the amplitude of MCAv oscillations during OLBNP (r=0.17, P=0.68). Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, ICA stiffness did not increase during 0.1 Hz OLBNP, and there was no correlation between ICA stiffness and the magnitude of MCAv oscillations induced at 0.1 Hz. These data suggest that ICA stiffness may not determine the magnitude of induced oscillations in cerebral blood flow. Future studies will examine these effects in older adults to determine the potential beneficial application of PPT for the treatment of low cerebral perfusion conditions (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, stroke).