Browsing by Author "Webb, Nathaniel"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Exploring the Association Between Patient-Centered Communication and Awareness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: A Cross-sectional Study(2024-03-21) Akpan, Idara; Nhpang, Roi San; Webb, Nathaniel; Alkhatib, Sarah; Krenek, Brittany; Griner, Stacey; Thompson, ErikaPurpose: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is effective in preventing anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers, including genital warts. The HPV vaccine is approved for individuals aged 9-45 years old and creates the opportunity for healthcare providers to educate parents, caregivers, and patients on the benefits of the vaccine. Effective provider-patient interactions promote collaboration, increase self-efficacy, and support decision-making. This study aimed to assess the association between patient-centered communication and patient awareness of the HPV vaccine. We also examined sociodemographic factors associated with HPV vaccine awareness. Methods: The sample population included adults aged 18-45 (n=1384) from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (Cycle 6). The outcome variable was HPV vaccine awareness (yes/no), assessed by whether the respondent has ever heard of the cervical cancer vaccine or HPV shot. The primary predictor variable was patient-centered communication, and this was operationalized using the 7-item Patient-Centered Communication scale (PCC scale). The items assessed respondents’ experiences during their healthcare visits, such as the chance to ask questions, attention to their feelings, involvement in decision-making, time availability, clarity of information presented, comprehension of information, and help with uncertainty. The scale response options ranged from 1=Always to 4=Never. The association between patient-centered communication and HPV vaccine awareness was examined using weighted multivariable logistic regression, while controlling for age, sex, race, education attainment, marital status, health insurance status, and number of healthcare visits in the past 12 months. Results: The mean age of the sample population was 34.1 years (SD=7.2 years). Approximately 52.5% and 47.5% identified as women and men, respectively. Individuals identified as White non-Hispanic (56.2%), Black non-Hispanic (10.2%), Hispanic (19.6%), and Asian/Other non-Hispanic (14.0%). Approximately 40.4% of individuals had a college degree or higher, and 89.8% reported having health insurance coverage. Overall, 72.7% self-reported they had heard about the HPV vaccine. The PCC scale mean was 74.0 (range 0-100). Patient-centered communication was not statistically associated with HPV vaccine awareness. Compared to men, women had higher odds of HPV vaccine awareness (aOR=2.83; 95%CI=1.62-4.97). Individuals with some college (aOR=2.25; 95%CI=1.01-5.01) and college degree or higher (aOR=2.87; 95%CI=1.44-5.77) had higher odds of HPV vaccine awareness than those with less than a high school/12 years/high school diploma. Compared to individuals aged 18-26, individuals aged 27-45 had higher odds of HPV vaccine awareness (aOR=1.91; 95%CI=1.02-3.57). Black (aOR=0.24; 95%CI=0.12-0.49), Asian/Other (aOR=0.24; 95%CI=0.12-0.49), and Hispanic (aOR=0.36; 95%CI=0.21-0.59) individuals had lower odds of being aware of the HPV vaccine than whites. Conclusions: The absence of statistically significant relationship between patient-centered communication and HPV vaccine awareness underscores the need to investigate other factors that influence patient knowledge and decision-making regarding the HPV vaccine. Provider recommendation is one of the known strategies to address misconceptions and increase uptake of the HPV vaccine, particularly among populations who are at increased risk for HPV. However, individuals with limited or no access to healthcare may seek health information from other readily available sources. Exploring racial/ethnic disparities in HPV vaccine awareness is imperative, including identifying effective, evidence-based dissemination strategies that meet the information needs of diverse populations.Item Health Equity Implications of Transgender Policies in the United States: A Legal Epidemiology Approach(2023) Webb, Nathaniel; Kline, Nolan; Johnson, Kaeli; Yording, Hayley; Griner, Stacey; Brunell, DavidIntroduction Transgender (trans) populations experience worse health outcomes compared to cis-gender populations, including higher rates of poor mental health, experiences of medical bias, and communicable diseases. These health disparities are broadly influenced by the political context within individual states that can perpetuate social exclusion. In the last five years, there has been a sharp increase in exclusionary legislation related to trans individuals that can deepen health inequality and exacerbate poor health outcomes. Using a legal epidemiological approach, we conducted a policy scan of state-level legislation in the United States to determine geographic distribution, frequency, and whether the legislation was trans affirming and/or exclusionary. Methods We searched the Westlaw policy database to identify proposed legislation in U.S. states between 2017-2021 using search terms related to "transgender.” The initial search identified 1280 results, of which, 698 proposed bills were included in the final analysis. Five researchers reviewed the proposed legislation and categorized each bill into "affirming” or "exclusionary” categories. Using a priori themes identified in the grey literature and refined among the research team, bills were further categorized by the theme of the legislation into 11 categories: athletics, bathrooms, administrative changes, affirmation care, religious claims, recognition, rights in the healthcare field, training revisions, criminal justice reform, education and school, and government augmentation. These categories were used to calculate affirming density, exclusionary density, and inclusivity scores and corresponding maps for legislation related to trans populations in each state. Results Of the 698 policies reviewed, 567 (81.23%) were affirming of trans identities while 131 (18.77%) were exclusionary of trans identities. Affirming legislation included policies related to government augmentation (20.81%), education/school (18.34%), administrative bills (18.17%), criminal justice reform/legal protections (15.34%), rights in the healthcare field (11.46%), training revisions (10.05%), recognition (4.94%) affirmation care (0.71%), and athletics (0.18%). Exclusionary legislation included policies related to athletics (58.78%), affirmation care (24.43%), bathrooms (7.63%), education/school (3.82%), religious claims (2.29%), administrative changes (1.53%) and rights in the healthcare field (1.53%). Affirming legislation was most prominent in the West Coast, the Northeast, and parts of the Midwest. Conversely, exclusionary legislation was highly prevalent among Southeast, South Central, and Mountain West regions. Discussion This study laid the foundation for further analysis of the political context and its influence on trans health. Exclusionary and affirming density maps indicate vastly different political contexts for trans individuals depending on US state. Such political contexts can contribute to social exclusion of trans individuals that exacerbates poor health outcomes. Further, the magnitude of legislation proposed was starkly different between affirming and exclusionary policies. Exclusionary policies focused on criminalization of trans-related issues such as gender-affirming care. Comparatively, affirming policies were largely focused on forms of representation related to local boards or governing committees (government augmentation). Representation of LGBTQ+ communities in government is incredibly important but may not negate the harm caused by the criminalization of trans-related care. Future research is needed to investigate legal etiologies of health disparities seen in trans populations compared to cisgendered populations.