Browsing by Subject "chronic low back pain"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Association of Pain Sensitivity with Outcome Measures for Quality of Life, Functional Ability and Current Pain Intensity in Chronic Low Back Pain(2021-05) Doud, Ronnie L.; Sumien, Nathalie; Licciardone, John C.; Kearns, Cathleen; Phillips, Nicole R.Pain sensitivity, as measured by the self-reported Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), was investigated using data from the PRECISION Pain Research Registry. Outcome measures for quality of life, functional ability, and current pain intensity were found to be significantly associated with PSQ Total in participants reporting chronic low back pain, even when controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, smoking status, and body mass index. Higher reported pain sensitivity correlated with reported higher pain intensity, lower quality of life, and increased physical disability.Item Feasibility Trial of an eHealth Intervention for Health-Related Quality of Life: Implications for Managing Patients with Chronic Pain during the COVID-19 Pandemic(MDPI, 2020-10-01) Licciardone, John C.; Pandya, VishrutiPURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the feasibility of providing an eHealth intervention for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) to facilitate patient self-management. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from 2019-2020 within the Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation. Eligible patients included those with chronic low back pain and a SPADE (sleep disturbance, pain interference with activities, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue) cluster score >/= 55 based on the relevant scales from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instrument with 29 items (PROMIS-29). Patients were randomized to the eHealth treatment group, which received a tailored HRQOL report and interpretation guide, or to a wait-list control group. The primary outcome was change in the SPADE cluster score, including its five component scales, over 3 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in low back pain intensity and back-related disability. Treatment effects were measured using the standardized mean difference (SMD) in change scores between groups. The eHealth intervention was also assessed by a survey of the experimental treatment group 1 month following randomization. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were randomized, including 52 in the eHealth treatment group and 50 in the wait-list control group, and 100 (98%) completed the trial. A majority of patients agreed that the HRQOL report was easy to understand (86%), provided new information (79%), and took actions to read or learn more about self-management approaches to improve their HRQOL (77%). Although the eHealth intervention met the criteria for a small treatment effect in improving the overall SPADE cluster score (SMD = 0.24; p= 0.23) and anxiety (SMD = 0.24; p = 0.23), and for a small-to-medium treatment effect in improving depression (SMD = 0.37; p = 0.06) and back-related disability (SMD = 0.36; p = 0.07), none of these results achieved statistical significance because of limited sample size. CONCLUSION: Given the feasibility of rapid online deployment, low cost, and low risk of adverse events, this eHealth intervention for HRQOL may be useful for patients with chronic pain during the COVID-19 pandemic.Item Interexaminer Reliability of Somatic Palpatory Findings Associated with Chronic Low Back Pain(2002-05-01) Russo, David P.; Scott Stoll; John C. Licciardone; Russell GamberRusso, David P., Interexaminer Reliability of Somatic Palpatory Findings Associated with Chronic Low Back Pain. Master of Science, May 2002, 15 pp., 1 table, 1 figure, bibliography, 26 titles. Osteopathic physicians rely on specific clinical palpatory tests to diagnose somatic dysfunction of the neuromusculoskeletal system. The purpose of this study is to compare the interexaminer reliability of six common osteopathic clinical tests to severity ratings of somatic dysfunction in six body regions. Ten trained and clinically supervised predoctoral osteopathic manipulative medicine fellows collected palpatory data using the Standardized Outpatient Osteopathic Soap Note Form (SNF) and recorded findings for six pre-selected osteopathic clinical diagnostic tests as part of a randomized controlled trial of osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain. Kappa coefficients were used to assess overall examiner agreement for the osteopathic clinical tests. Intraclass correlational coefficients (ICC) and Chronbach’s alpha were used to assess examiner agreement for the severity ratings. Kappa values for the six clinical tests ranged from 0 to 0.32. The single item ICC was 0.32, average item ICC was .74, and the coefficient alpha for internal consistency of the six body region scores was 0.80. These results indicate that diagnostic impressions of somatic dysfunction severity may be more reliable than outcomes from isolated osteopathic clinical tests.Item The SPADE symptom cluster and physical disability in chronic low back pain patients(2019-12) Hendrix, Zachary N.; Cross, Deanna S.; Licciardone, John C.; Kearns, Cathleen; Mathew, Stephen O.Introduction: Chronic pain is a major healthcare issue. It is debilitating and often occurs simultaneously with other health issues (Murray et al., 2013; Shmagel et al., 2016). The SPADE symptom cluster (sleep disturbance, pain interference, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue) is common in chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients and may interact with their disability (Alamam et al., 2019; Davis et al., 2016; Tavares et al., 2019). Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized data from the Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation (PRECISION). The PROMIS-29 v2.0 was used to assess SPADE symptoms, and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was used to measure disability. The Spearman-Rho correlation between each SPADE symptom and disability was calculated. The correlations were then tested for significant differences and ranked in order of strongest to weakest correlation. Lastly, groups were assigned based on the number of presenting symptoms and tested for between-groups differences in mean disability. Results: Each of the five SPADE symptoms and the composite SPADE score were all positively and significantly correlated with disability. Pain Interference was most strongly correlated with disability. SPADE comorbidity was related to disability. Conclusion: SPADE symptoms greatly increase disability in chronic low back pain patients.