• Login
    View Item 
    •   UNTHSC Scholar
    • Research Appreciation Day
    • 2017
    • Abstracts
    • Rehabilitative Sciences
    • View Item
    •   UNTHSC Scholar
    • Research Appreciation Day
    • 2017
    • Abstracts
    • Rehabilitative Sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of Trunk and Leg Sway During Single Leg Stance

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2017-03-14
    Author
    Pennucci, Matt
    Liu, Howe
    Dillard, David
    Baker, Stephen
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Purpose/Hypothesis: A force platform is a commonly used instrument to evaluate body sway. However, such a platform is not able to analyze how different body parts respond during static single-leg stance. The purpose of this study was to use a small wearable gyroscope-based balance assessment instrument, Balance Gear, to investigate how different body parts respond during static single-leg stance. We hypothesized that measurements at the knee would exhibit more sway than measurements taken at the lumbar level. Materials and Methods: Nineteen (10 males and 9 females) healthy young graduate students from the principal investigator’s institution were screened and recruited for this study. The Balance Gear (BG) was secured at two locations: L4 level (LUM), and popliteal fossa (KN) of the dominant leg. Testing location was randomized in order to avoid fatigue effect. Subjects were asked to perform static single-leg stance on the dominant leg for 30 seconds. Data of the subject’s body sway (direction, range, velocity, and acceleration) were recorded and transmitted wirelessly to a computer for data storage and analysis. Paired t-tests were used for data processing. Results: Subjects with the BG at KN showed a statistically significant difference in body sway range, velocity, and acceleration in the antero-posterior plane (p.05). Also, both LUM and KN sway posteriorly, but KN showed significantly larger range, velocity and acceleration compared to sway at LUM (all p Conclusions: It is the very first time the sway of different body parts were assessed during static single-leg stance. During stance, the KN is larger in range, velocity, and more posterior direction than the LUM sway.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12503/27755
    Collections
    • Rehabilitative Sciences

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UNTHSC ScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV