• Login
    View Item 
    •   UNTHSC Scholar
    • Research Appreciation Day
    • 2022
    • Abstracts
    • Structural Anatomy
    • View Item
    •   UNTHSC Scholar
    • Research Appreciation Day
    • 2022
    • Abstracts
    • Structural Anatomy
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Massage application to decrease anesthetic spread in brachial plexus blocks: A cadaveric study

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2022
    Author
    Coffman, Taylor
    Fisher, Cara
    Handler, Emma
    Nash, Daniel
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction: Peripheral nerve blocks of the brachial plexus have become increasingly popular for upper limb surgery due to the benefits of using regional anesthesia. However, anesthetic from supraclavicular nerve blocks can spread medially and anesthetize the phrenic nerve, leading to partial paralysis of the diaphragm, also known as hemidiaphragmatic paresis. The addition of ultrasound guidance has reduced the incidence of phrenic nerve involvement due to the ability to see the spread of anesthetic in real time. There has been little research focused on whether or not ultrasound massage could manipulate anesthetic distally down the arm and away from the phrenic nerve. The aim of this study is to determine if ultrasound massage can be used to minimize the spread of anesthesia medially. Methods: Four fresh frozen cadavers were injected with 15 mls of a 25:75 mixture of methylene blue and 2% lidocaine. The specimens were divided into control (n=4) and massage (n=4) groups. A nurse anesthetist used ultrasound guidance to perform a supraclavicular block. Immediately following injection, the massage group received 5 distally directed massage strokes with the ultrasound transducer. After 15 minutes, both groups were dissected and measurements of anesthetic spread were taken. The medial spread was measured in all four cadavers and distal spread was measured in three out of the four. Results: Spread of anesthetic medially was not reduced in the massage group when compared to the control group. Distal spread of the anesthetic was increased in the massage group when compared to the control group (p< 0.05). Conclusions: The similarity of medial spread between the two groups implies ultrasound massage application will not prevent phrenic nerve palsy any more than a traditional supraclavicular block. The increased distal spread of the anesthetic suggests this technique can improve anesthesia to the brachial plexus by increasing the area the anesthetic travels. Significance: The incidence of phrenic nerve palsy during a supraclavicular block has decreased since the introduction of ultrasound, but some reservations persist when using the technique in non-healthy patients. Phrenic nerve palsy can cause respiratory distress in patients with pre-existing respiratory condition. Given the small sample size, continued study of this method is needed to further evaluate if this method could be used to reduce incidence of phrenic nerve palsy.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12503/31125
    Collections
    • Structural Anatomy

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UNTHSC ScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV