• Login
    View Item 
    •   UNTHSC Scholar
    • University Publications
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • School of Public Health
    • View Item
    •   UNTHSC Scholar
    • University Publications
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • School of Public Health
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Do brief motivational interventions increase motivation for change in drinking among college students? A meta-analysis of individual participant data

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    2022_08_sph_Tan_Zhengqi_dissertation.pdf (1.789Mb)
    Date
    2022-08
    Author
    Tan, Zhengqi
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Brief Motivational Interventions (BMIs) have been identified as one of the most effective individually focused alcohol intervention strategies for college students in the United States. Despite the central role of motivation for change in BMIs, whether BMIs increase motivation for change has rarely been investigated. The current study conducted a meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD; 15 studies, N = 5,903) from Project INTEGRATE (Mun et al., 2015) to examine whether BMIs increase motivation for change in drinking. Different measures and responses used in the original trials were harmonized across studies, and effect size estimates were derived from a model that adjusted for baseline motivation and demographic variables for each study (step 1) and subsequently combined in a random-effects meta-analysis model (step 2). After adjustment for baseline levels of motivation level and demographic variables, the intervention effects of BMIs on motivation for change was not statistically significant (standard mean difference [SMD]: 0.026, 95% CI: [-0.001, 0.053], p = .06, k = 19). Subsequent metaregression analyses among BMI subtypes indicated that the intervention effect did not differ between individually delivered motivational interviewing with personalized feedback (MI+PF), stand-alone personalized feedback (PF), and group-based motivational interviewing (GMI). Among all BMI subtypes, only GMI had a statistically significant intervention effect on motivation compared to controls (SMD: 0.055, 95% CI: [0.007, 0.103], p = .025, k = 5). Within the first three months post-intervention, there was a decrease in SMD of 0.05 (95% CI: [0.01, 0.08]) in motivation per month. However, no statistically significant difference in the intervention effects was found between studies with short-term vs. long-term follow-up. Although the results from the current study do not support the hypothesis that BMIs improve motivation for change, the evidence as a whole suggests ways in which motivation may be improved following intervention and can be tested in future studies.
    Subject
    brief motivational interventions
    motivation for change
    subtype of BMIs
    individual participant data
    meta-analysis
    Project INTEGRATE
    Motivational Interviewing
    Alcohol Drinking
    Psychological, Feedback
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12503/31895
    Collections
    • School of Public Health
    • Theses and Dissertations

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UNTHSC ScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    TDL
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV