Comparative Case Study of the American Medical Association's Role and Strategy in Health Care Reform During the Clinton and Obama Administrations.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorLykens, Kristine
dc.creatorKimble, Lawson C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-22T21:45:27Z
dc.date.available2019-08-22T21:45:27Z
dc.date.issued2010-05-01
dc.date.submitted2010-11-01T14:41:15-07:00
dc.description.abstractThe arena of health policy is always evolving as the players in it evolve. One of the main players is the AMA. This paper takes an in depth look at how the evolution of the AMA has affected health system reform in the United States by examining two story lines of separate attempts at health care reform. Through comparative analysis, conclusions are made as to how the AMA has transformed and positioned itself in a new role within health policy formulation and implementation.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12503/29562
dc.language.isoen
dc.provenance.legacyDownloads139
dc.subjecthealth reform
dc.subjectAMA
dc.subjecthealth policy
dc.subjectinterest group
dc.titleComparative Case Study of the American Medical Association's Role and Strategy in Health Care Reform During the Clinton and Obama Administrations.
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentSchool of Public Health
thesis.degree.disciplineHealth Management and Policy
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Public Health

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kimble_ETD_mendedscanOct2010_OCR.pdf
Size:
15.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

School of Public Health
Theses and Dissertations